Could you tell me the friends you were sharing your password with? Is it true that RaveenS is the one brought up the idea of "Netmonger is Arsath" it's very disheartening to hear something like that, because this literally is back stabbing. Answering my questions would help you clear your name. ŇëŧΜǒńğëŗTalk08:15, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
They are my schoolmates. Mostly we used to communicate via e-mail. These days they are very angry I am not that strong enough defending Tamil issues. Raveen gave some idea that "Netmonger might be Arsath" and I shared with my friends.Rajkumar Kanagasingam08:54, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
One think i can't understand is that in your bio it is said that you are not a student anymore while you are talking about your schoolmates here. Could you please explain that? -- FayssalF - Wiki me up ®09:57, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I have no problems w/ that but this should be the last time you give away your password to people, Rajkumar. I will unblock that account. You can keep this same account as a sock but please avoid using it for things breaching the policies. -- FayssalF - Wiki me up ®10:56, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I think something funny is going with my Account 'Rajsingam", while I was trying to change the password, it was already changed by someone else and had done the following edit [1].
What can I do with those "bad edits" as those accounts are linked with my Bio. Can't you put a note or do any other arrangements to avoid future problems.Rajkumar Kanagasingam13:01, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Crazy stuff happening with your previous account.. Good that it ended, in the future please don't share your password with anyone else and also try to edit with only one account, I believe the account User:SAR23 is also yours, editing from multiple accounts is not at all recommended. And avoid editing your own biography, wikipedia is not a place for a Auto Biography. Anyway Harmonious editing with your new account. And remember without much effort truth will (always) prevail. ŇëŧΜǒńğëŗTalk14:38, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Most of the citations of your BIO, Rajkumar Kanagasingam comes from the article which you wrote
here..on the top left its written, GERMAN MEMORIES OF ASIA v. Rajkumar Kanasingam - 09.08.2006 By Rajkumar Kanagasingam ..If you cant find anything written by others of you, I sincerely ask you to remove the contents..I don't think we can trust what you say about your self after all these sagas.thanksIwazaki 会話。討論04:58, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Autobiographies violate several guidelines, and will probably be deleted. on Rajkumar Kanagasingam. using TW
You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest.
You are continuously vandalising my Bio over dispute related to Talk:Anton Balasingham. You all tried hard to delete my Bio from wikipedia. You can see the evidence here(1) and here(2)'
You are taking an undue interest over my Bio. I requested an Administrator to check my Bio whether Citations are enough. I also taken this matter for Request for Comment. Though I have off-line media archives(which are attached on Talk:Rajkumar Kanagasingam, I couldn't bring it to the articles. Rajkumar Kanagasingam06:13, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not accuse people of sockpuppetry without a good reason. He has already explained that the "sockpuppets" were actually some other people. Also, this user is relatively new, so I wouldn't call it spamming. Any further targeting of this user may result in a block, so keep cool. Thank You. --KZ Talk •Vandal• Contrib 09:03, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oh you have explained it here..If this is the reason, then I can safely ignore your post.Accepting or not is not the problem..He has spammed wikipedia several times, using various accounts..I am very much surprised that you have taken his word for granted..How do we know he was telling the truth or not ?? He has accused other uses as he wish and we dont even know these are true or not.
ALSO, what about his sock puppet do do bird ?? Did you know he had used it to make consensus and voting ?? Also, there is another account which he uses named SAR23..It also has spammed wikipedia ! I am very cool and calm..BUT, everything has its limits.For the sake of wikipedia this must be stopped for good.thanks--Iwazaki 会話。討論09:20, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If you have any proof of that, take it to WP:SSP. Until then, I am giving him a benefit of the doubt. How would you know if he is telling lies or not? Also, the date of first edit is not necessarily a guarantee of experience. I know many people who had less experience than me, but have been on Wikipedia much longer. If this escalates any more, I'm taking this to the Mediation Committee. He's been warned for violation of WP:COI, not spamming--KZ Talk •Vandal• Contrib 09:32, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry if i didn't make it clear, but i meant evidence against Rajkumar Kanagasingam as a sock. He explained to the admin above that the account is operated by a friend, not him. --KZ Talk •Vandal• Contrib 09:48, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the proofs Lahiruk. Actually I am really surprised with the way some people have taken all of his words for granted, yet no action has been taken against the people whom he alleged!! Either he is lying or raveen and his other friends are lying!!
I would give my benefit of doubt to the people who he accused.I have seen the way he has been acting over wikipedia, coupled with the fact that he made several unproven claims over his bio(which I call lies), made my decision easier.
He had spammed wikipedia and made several vicious attacks on several wikipedians(some are his friends), and rightly deserve a severe warning.
I haven't taken his words for granted. Although he did cause trouble for violation of COI among other things, i still do not think he needs such a warning for spamming. It doesn't matter much anyway since he got blocked for 3RR. --KZ Talk •Vandal• Contrib 10:02, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You have accused me of misusing your sock puppets. All what I have done with you so far has been to advice you about how to follow wiki rules. Now you are breaking another wiki rule WP:LIBEL and WP:ATTACK out side of WP:NPA, WP:COI, WP:SPAM, WP:SOCK as you have done previously. First if you believe that I misused your account I suggest you report it to Admin Notice Board (ANI) they will investigate my IP’s and will let the wiki community know as to who is lying or not. If you don’t have the guts to go to ANI then I suggest you remove all the comments you made about me in other peoples talk pages. Failing that I will pursue this till my name is cleared. Thanks RaveenS14:49, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Raveen, Now I know what is happening and who are really behind this malicious postings using my previous accounts "Rajsingam" and "DoDoBirds". It is not you. I apologize for the accusations, which derived out of panic on my part.Rajkumar Kanagasingam15:39, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yesterday I didn't accuse Raveen. Then what about my other schoolmates whom I mentioned. But in the morning, when I checked the e-mail, it was already checked by someone else, so I have some reason to change my opinion today.Rajkumar Kanagasingam16:43, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Stop lying !! I am sincerely requesting you, this..You have accused not only raveen but also your other wikipedian friends for so many things..And don't twist what you said already..If some one has checked your mails, please take it to the necessary authority..Wikipedia is not the place to entertain your personal quarries..And please remember this is not your BLOG!!Iwazaki 会話。討論08:45, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Don't think this is your Blog even. Because of the e-mail theft only all these happened. When other wikipedians are silent why you a few wikipedians are always trying to come out with nonsense. I posted the following unauthorised access to my e-mail password at least some exprienced wikipedians might take proper step. Stop your nonsense once and for all.Rajkumar Kanagasingam08:58, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Do you have a problem reading dates ?? Did you know march 9 and 8 are not the same ?? Please tell us which come first ?? 9 or 8 ?? could you care to tell me what kind of nonsense i added here ?? was it me who said these nonsense and these nonsense.and a lot more if you really want to see!Iwazaki 会話。討論09:22, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I am not asking you anything, definitely not anything worth to be on wikipedia..I am not even slightly trying to explain any thing to you either. Because I don't cast pearls before swine..thanksIwazaki 会話。討論09:49, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You simply dont learn do you.. :-) How would anyone believe, that you posting message here that somebody requested for your password from a particular IP is true...
The points to notice here is
The requested password is emailed to your own gmail account (are u saying that password is also cracked!!!).. (how stupid one could be to request a password and get it emailed to another email address of the same person)
You shared your passwords with your friends, which is a very stupid thing to do.Evidence
You said the friends whom shared the passwords with are angry with you. EvidenceEvidence2
You admitted you used the same passwords for the email and wiki and friends misused it.Evidence
Wikipedia is not a place to solve your inability to protect your own email box.
who gave you the right to use my signature on the title of the topic? ( I have removed it..)
This is evidence enough that you dont deserve an article of your own...
Albert Einstein said “Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe.”
P:S: Whoever cracked this guys passwordS... (if they were really cracked) please let me know how to do it.. I didn't know email passwords are so easy to crack/hack.. bcos in this case it seems they were cracked/hacked almost everyday ŇëŧΜǒńğëŗTalk14:25, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Reply to Netmonger
Hey, Netmonger,
Don't bluff anymore.
This is wikipedia, otherwise I know how to address you.
If an authorised administrator request, I will give the password of the e-mail - rajsingam@mail.com (which I changed before you changed the password).
There the evidence of your IP address is there.
I don't want to discuss anything anymore with you.
Even I won't answer to you anything if you post anything.
I request an Administrator to advise me what to do next.
That is not my friends you did those malicious postings everywhere first stealing my e-mail password(I used my first name "rajkumar" as password initially). Thereafter you found my wiki passwords from there.
From: "Lost Password Request"
To: rajsingam@mail.com
Subject: Unauthorized password retrieval
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 06:48:24 +0000
An unauthorized request for password for your account was rejected.
Details of the request:
For account: rajsingam@mail.com
Password be sent to :
Request from IP address : 222.165.157.129
Request Date/Time : 2007-03-09 06:48:24 GMT
Anyone using SLT (Sri Lanka Telecom) could've been assigned this IP, but how do I believe that your postings above are genuine? Because you hadn't been genuine earlier, though you promised you will not resort to sockpuppeting.. SAR23 (talk·contribs) is one of your new puppet accounts, so I seriously doubt the sincerity of your statements, I am really sorry to say this. To prove my point that your postings above are not true see my message below.
From: "Lost Password Request"
To: rajsingam@mail.com
Subject: Unauthorized password retrieval
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2007 08:56:24 +0000
An unauthorized request for password for your account was rejected.
Details of the request:
For account: rajsingam@mail.com
Password be sent to :
Request from IP address : 222.165.157.129
Request Date/Time : 2007-03-09 08:56:24 GMT
The above is obviously made up by me, the point is none of your claims are Verifiable, so u don't necessarily prove anything. Please lets stop this harassment, I really don't understand why you have to be like this. If you gave your passwords to your friends you'll have to live with it, I can't be held responsible for your foolishness. (which again confirms the point that you don't deserve a wikipedia article :o) think about it) ŇëŧΜǒńğëŗTalk09:19, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If an authorised administrator requests, I will give the password of the e-mail - rajsingam@mail.com (which I changed before "Netmonger and Group" changed the password).
Another attempt to access my password succeeded without my authority.
I request wikipedia to investigate which User was trying to hack the password.
Details are below.
A request for password to your account rajsingam@mail.com was
granted, your password has been emailed to
rajkumar.kanagasingam@gmail.com
Details of the request:
For account: rajsingam@mail.com
Password be sent to :
rajkumar.kanagasingam@gmail.com
Request from IP address : 203.115.31.180
Request Date/Time : 2007-03-09 07:35:48 GMT
Thanks.Rajkumar Kanagasingam07:50, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
(1)
An unauthorized request for password for your account was rejected.
Details of the request:
For account: rajsingam@mail.com
Password be sent to : xyz@google.com
Request from IP address : 128.205.146.89
Request Date/Time : 2007-03-09 17:28:46 GMT
Note: This IP address is from Buffalo, New York, USA. Any wikipedian will come to know who might be this(possible) from his userspace, who is always troubling me.He has come out with a lengthy statement with Delete vote on my bio AFD here. Rajkumar Kanagasingam06:17, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I Have some doubt only because of that only I mentioned in the beginning "who might be this (possible)". As you said even the IP could be from anyone in Sri Lanka, or from a proxy server. I think check user only can find that accurate who might be that actually.Rajkumar Kanagasingam09:35, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
(2)
An unauthorized request for password for your account was rejected.
Details of the request:
For account: rajsingam@mail.com
Password be sent to : moviefreakz234@yahoo.com
Request from IP address : 91.121.13.44
Request Date/Time : 2007-03-09 17:47:21 GMT — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rajkumar Kanagasingam (talk • contribs)
I can see that you're quite upset by this, and understandably so. I suggest that you immediately change the password on the User:Rajkumar Kanagasingam account (if you are currently signed in, I believe you can use the page Special:Preferences to change your Wikipedia account's password), and make certain that the new password is completely different from the password on any of your email accounts. Also, please remember to sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). LastChanceToBe05:07, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your concern. Now it is very difficult to access any of my passwords in wikipedia or e-mails. Earlier so foolishly I used everywhere the single password - < personal information removed >.Rajkumar Kanagasingam05:14, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.
I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Princess Diana Institute of Peace, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. utcursch | talk09:48, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Trampton has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Hi there; just a friendly reminder that we really need your input on the proposal being discussed here. Without it, we can't craft a solution which is acceptable to everyone, and without indicating your willingness to go along with a solution, the whole process could fail. Thanks in advance, --Haemo19:34, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
A question for you. I noticed that you had not edited wikipedia for over a year. What prompted you to check the Diana article, at this particular time? It seems to be rather good timing, and I wondered if there was anything behind your return. Sennen goroshi (talk) 16:46, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Deletion They really treated your article like shit. My apologies, they should have kept it. PS I think you're not a puppeteer. Sgt. bender (talk) 01:37, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
